Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNsoso, S.J.
dc.contributor.authorMorake, T.G.
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-13T09:18:31Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-15T09:02:52Z
dc.date.available2019-02-13T09:18:31Z
dc.date.available2021-03-15T09:02:52Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.citationNsoso, S. J., & Morake, T. G. (1999). A critical look at the use of exotic bulls in traditional beff farming in Botswana. South African Journal of Animal Science, 29(2).en_US
dc.identifier.issn0375-1589
dc.identifier.urihttp://moodle.buan.ac.bw:80/handle/123456789/102
dc.descriptionCopyright of South African Journal of Animal Science is the property of South African Society of Animal Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.en_US
dc.description.abstractData of indigenous and exotic bull breeds used between 1987 and 1995 were available from Ramatlabama Bull Stud and Artificial Insemination Laboratory. The bull breeds include indigenous breeds: Tswana, Tull, Bonsmara and Africander and exotic breeds: Brahman, Simmental, Hereford, South Devon, Santa Gertrudis, Friesian, Charolais, Pinzgauer, Sussex, Gilbviech and Jersey. These bulls were used in natural service (n = 6352 +/- 3047 bulls per year) and artificial insemination (n = 5261 +/- 1410 semen straws per year). Analyses of the data revealed that throughout the study period significantly (p < 0.05) more exotic bull breeds were used in natural service (94.9 +/- 2.2% vs 5.1 +/- 2.2% per year) and as semen (94.1 +/- 3.2% vs 5.9 +/- 3.2% per year) than indigenous bull breeds. Brahman bulls (56.5 +/- 5.4% per year in natural service, 54.4 +/- 6.6% per year in artificial insemination) were the highest in demand compared to other exotic (38.4 +/- 6.6% per year in natural service; 39.7 +/- 8.6% per year in artificial insemination) and indigenous bull breeds (5.9 +/- 2.2% per year in natural service; 5.1 +/- 2.2% per year in artificial insemination). The demands for Brahman and other exotic bull breeds were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than those of indigenous bull breeds in both natural service and semen collection. Such results are consistent with the promotion of the use of exotic bulls over this period through the government bull subsidy scheme and artificial insemination. This promotion was carried out after research showed that crossbred progeny sired by exotic bull breeds had higher productivity than progeny sired by indigenous bull breeds. Crossbreeding should not be practised under the traditional farming system. Under this system paddocks are not fenced hence breeding is not controlled, management expertise is mediocre in most cases, farmers can not afford to supplementary feed animals and farmers can not also afford high veterinary care for their crossbre.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBUANen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSouth African Journal of Animal Scienceen_US
dc.subjectBeef farmingen_US
dc.subjectCross breedingen_US
dc.subjectBullsen_US
dc.subjectTraditional farmingen_US
dc.titleA critical look at the use of exotic bulls in traditional beff farming in Botswana.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record